Images in this post missing? We recently lost them in a site migration. We're working to restore these as you read this. Should you need an image in an emergency, please contact us at
Where Did filterContext.ActionMethod Go?

Awww cmon Microsoft, play nice with us. I want to do something that should be pretty simple, I just need to know what action is being wrapped by my custom filter in ASP.NET MVC

After a surreal amount of Googling I finally found a blog post that showed where this little bit of information hides, in filterContext.ActionMethod. But I could have sworn I went over that 100x with Intellisense and never saw anything like that. Oh yes, indeed I did, Preview 5 removed this convenient method.

So after a bit of swearing, and a small (140 chars or less) rant on Twitter ... Sidar came up with the answer buried in the ASP.NET forums.

So what is the new location ... would you believe it is now an entry in the dictionary in RouteData??? No, nor would I have believed it. What kind of crazy world is this, when a strongly typed method is replaced by a magic string key to the RouteData dictionary :S

So for now, this fixes it, but I hope MS can make this all nice and strongly typed again, it is a fairly minor thing, but I like my Intellisense, and I hate magic strings:

public override void OnActionExecuting(
                 ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
   var methodName = (string)filterContext.RouteData.Values["action"];

p.s. Hmmm this Twitter thing may be the future ...


Posted 09-30-2008 5:57 PM by Jak Charlton



Steve wrote re: Where Did filterContext.ActionMethod Go?
on 09-30-2008 10:44 PM

I wondered as well.


Eilon Lipton wrote re: Where Did filterContext.ActionMethod Go?
on 09-30-2008 11:48 PM

Hi Casey,

One of the reasons it was removed is that we were making our APIs sufficiently extensible for other controller implementations, such as those used by dynamic languages, for example IronPython. In dynamic languages there is no MethodInfo at all, so we can't give you anything. However, we're thinking of adding back some functionality such as providing the list of attributes on the method.

One thing that's important for us to understand is exactly why you need that data. If what you want is the action name as seen in the URL then it's entirely correct to dig into the RouteData. That's all we would do for you anyway if you wanted just the action name, so we felt there was little value there.

Keep in mind that in Preview 5 and forward the action name doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the name of the method being executed for the action. The two naming concepts are unrelated, so we don't want to mislead people by providing an action name - it wouldn't be clear which name it refers to.



Jak Charlton wrote re: Where Did filterContext.ActionMethod Go?
on 10-01-2008 2:52 AM


Thanks very much for that explanation. I appreciate where you are coming from, and also appreciate that the action name should be recovered from the RouteData ... I think my frustration is that more and more magic strings are appearing over our ASP.NET MVC application, and while I fully accept there is almost no chance that this value will change, it is still left open to a lot of guesswork as to what it is in the first place - hence why I posted this to save other people the same frustration ... but this post will soon disappear into the depths of time, and the next generation of MVC developers will have to discover this one all over again.

There is a strongly typed method for ActionParameters on the filterContext, I guess all I am asking is that all other relevant "metadata" be exposed in a similar way, so that the dependency upon the magic string is in the MVC framework, rather than in our codebase.

In this case, the purpose of this attribute/ActionFilter is a templating engine - by adding an attribute of "Templated" the attribute goes off to the relevant template defintions, sets up metadata like Title and Meta tags, loads up all "static" html content from the database, and populates ViewData with it appropriately. Without the method name (or action name specifically) we would not know which template definition to be loading, or which navigation menu options to set.

With this we now have a method that looks like:


       public ActionResult Index()


           return View((string)ViewData["TemplateViewName"]);


If we could also eliminate the call into ViewData at the end, that would alsobe cool - have yet to investigate how to write this into the Result as part of the attribute ....

clash of clans astuce wrote clash of clans astuce
on 10-07-2014 10:24 AM

Where Did filterContext.ActionMethod Go? - Jak Charlton - Insane World - - Just the Tasty Bits

About The CodeBetter.Com Blog Network
CodeBetter.Com FAQ

Our Mission

Advertisers should contact Brendan

Google Reader or Homepage Latest Items
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with myFeedster
Add to My AOL
Furl Latest Items
Subscribe in Rojo

Member Projects
DimeCasts.Net - Derik Whittaker

Friends of
Red-Gate Tools For SQL and .NET


SmartInspect .NET Logging
NGEDIT: ViEmu and Codekana
NHibernate Profiler
Balsamiq Mockups
JetBrains - ReSharper
Web Sequence Diagrams
Ducksboard<-- NEW Friend!


Site Copyright © 2007 CodeBetter.Com
Content Copyright Individual Bloggers


Community Server (Commercial Edition)