My latest in a series of the weekly, or more often, summary of interesting links I come across related to Visual Studio. Lisa Feigenbaum is looking for feedback on a potential Call Hierarchy feature on The Visual Basic Team blog. Visual Studio 2008 KB

You ain't kidding.  Not to mention I find the WCF style kludgy to use - the 2.0 style is much simpler and 'in-line' with traditional programming in my view - 1) create object, 2)call method on object, 3)do something with result, 4)dispose object - the web service is just another set of objects as far as the code *you* are writing is concerned.

Thanks for all the clicks MS.  What a pain in the ass.  That could cause some people a good hour worth of time.

You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com

Thanks for the info. Porting my old app to work with .net 2008, i also came across this problem. Another issue that i have is -

i add the solution to sourcesafe along  with web service and all seems fine.

If another sourcesafe user tries to get the solution, the webservices creates another directory under projects. Any idea how i can get the source code of webservice  to be in c:\inetpub\wwwroot\projectWebService.? .  If i delete my entire solution and get new solution from sourcesafe everything works fine.

You are my savior Derek.Thanks a lot for ur detailed response

If i were a girl i would give you a lapdance!

My current client has a BI group that writes SSRS reports. In the "legacy" ALM tool they built,

Exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

Excellent article. Spot on.

Keep up the good work.

I guess I missed the internal memo on "oh yeah this release we have the following additional pain-features..."

Thanks!!!!!!!!

Embarassing when you are writing a solution for a customer and realize that all of a sudden you dont even know how to create a web reference?!

Thanks dude.

I agree with MicrosoftEmployee 's comments above.

I was looking like a monkey at a client's office trying to figure out how this works.

would be way sweeter if the images from the "article" still worked ;)