Tim Barcz

Sponsors

The Lounge

Wicked Cool Jobs

Groups and Affiliations

Syndication

News

Images in this post missing? We recently lost them in a site migration. We're working to restore these as you read this. Should you need an image in an emergency, please contact us at imagehelp@codebetter.com
Scrum - A Not-so-bad Development Methodology

When I first graduated from college I worked on embedded systems where the process was a formal, military grade process.  When developing software I typically thought about what document I had to write next and what document(s) I may be missing.  In general, the MIL standards turned me off a bit to process, and for awhile left me thinking that process is an obstruction to true development.  As a 21 year old, you think code = development.  That was/is an immature point of view, but it was not a viewpoint that I was easily dissuaded from.  Further it's a point of view that many out there still hold dear, and not all who hold that view are recent college graduates.

Recently a small group of us decided to give Scrum a try and are using it to drive our current project.  Other than this effort, there is no formal process methodology in place.  My goal is to help change that in my new position.  Over the past several years many high value projects have never been worked on because there was no common backlog of all of the things that need to be done.

In my last job at Geonetric we adopted Scrum after the absence of a formal methodology and it provided a much needed framework around which to develop.  Many CEO's are not this up front with their deficiencies, but Eric is pretty awesome and very honest in his evaluation of Geonetric:

As we were in the middle of developing the newest version of our VitalSite product last fall, we weren’t making the progress we wanted-even though the whole team was running full tilt and putting in its best efforts. We had always been a bit informal about how we developed software-somewhere between draconian rigid requirements and completely freeform cowboy (and cowgirl!) coding practices. The problem was that being in the middle wasn’t working. So, we looked at some of the newest practices in the industry.

Eric goes on to list the benefits he's seen since adopting Scrum:

  • Since adopting Scrum, the first two releases of VitalSite 5 have been on-target, meeting both scope and deadline requirements (5.0 in January and 5.1 in May).
  • Software development is accelerating each sprint - we’re approaching twice the speed we had last year.
  • There’s much more collaboration between disciplines
  • The morale of the software team is higher
  • Quality of the software we’re delivering is better

With results like that I can see why a CEO would like scrum.  As developer though, I like scrum in that it doesn't get in my way.  There is administrative overhead to Scrum to be sure.  However it's very "XP" in that there aren't scads of documentation to write.  Generally as a software professional I like to write code and solve problems and for the most part Scrum allows me to do that.  My development does not feel slowed down by Scrum, which I believe for most developers, is a must in order to be adopted willingly.

One side effect of scrum is that is causes me to think about the process in a pleasant way.  This morning at our standup meeting, a fellow developer and I got into a discussion about how his extra exploratory work in the evenings should be factored into our sprint.  Should we could his work towards our sprint commitment?  Will his work negatively/positively affect our velocity for future sprints?  From my experience, developers typically don't worry about this stuff however with Scrum the sprint commitment is something that should be taken seriously.  As such it was good to see developers, of which I was one, having talks about other things that just the code.

I'm sure many other processes out there could achieve the same thing.  Scrum for us, both in this job and the previous, provided a nice framework that was palatable to developers. In that respect I'm perfectly happy using Scrum.  I will keep my ears open for new ideas and processes, but I think for any development methodology to be successful in an organization, it has to be readily and whole-heartedly adopted.  We've enjoyed Scrum so far and as such, it's a not-so-bad development methodology.  If you aren't using a methodology or your current process isn't working, you should give Scrum a try.


Posted 08-18-2008 2:49 PM by Tim Barcz
Filed under: ,

[Advertisement]

Comments

Rod Howarth wrote re: Scrum - A Not-so-bad Development Methodology
on 08-18-2008 7:57 PM

Great Post,

though..

"With results like that I can see why a CEO would like scrum.  "

You mean, wouldn't like scrum right?

Tim Barcz wrote re: Scrum - A Not-so-bad Development Methodology
on 08-18-2008 9:06 PM

@Rod,

My wording was correct....all of the things my former CEO were positives in his book.  What I wanted the readers to take away was that Scrum so far has been a good marriage between what a developer wants in a process ("stay out of my way") and what a CEO wants in a process ("give me more features faster so I can make more money").

Dew Drop - August 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew wrote Dew Drop - August 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew
on 08-19-2008 9:09 AM

Pingback from  Dew Drop - August 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for August 19, 2008 wrote Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for August 19, 2008
on 08-19-2008 5:23 PM

Pingback from  Arjan`s World    » LINKBLOG for August 19, 2008

ESME » Blog Archive » Scrumming to the line wrote ESME » Blog Archive » Scrumming to the line
on 09-03-2008 3:08 PM

Pingback from  ESME  » Blog Archive   » Scrumming to the line

Recent Links Tagged With "scrum" - JabberTags wrote Recent Links Tagged With "scrum" - JabberTags
on 09-15-2008 7:34 PM

Pingback from  Recent Links Tagged With "scrum" - JabberTags

Tim Barcz wrote Moving to Kanban, Did Scrum Fail?
on 08-06-2009 11:26 PM

Several months ago our software team decided to dive into the Scrum process. What we were doing before

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?

About The CodeBetter.Com Blog Network
CodeBetter.Com FAQ

Our Mission

Advertisers should contact Brendan

Subscribe
Google Reader or Homepage

del.icio.us CodeBetter.com Latest Items
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with myFeedster
Add to My AOL
Furl CodeBetter.com Latest Items
Subscribe in Rojo

Member Projects
DimeCasts.Net - Derik Whittaker

Friends of Devlicio.us
Red-Gate Tools For SQL and .NET

NDepend

SlickEdit
 
SmartInspect .NET Logging
NGEDIT: ViEmu and Codekana
LiteAccounting.Com
DevExpress
Fixx
NHibernate Profiler
Unfuddle
Balsamiq Mockups
Scrumy
JetBrains - ReSharper
<-- NEW Friend!

 



Site Copyright © 2007 CodeBetter.Com
Content Copyright Individual Bloggers

 

Community Server (Commercial Edition)

CodeBetter.Com